"Strong Durham Schools"

A nice idea, in some respects, but the organizers' decision to reject any negative information and only to focus on positive reports, makes this much higher on promotion than on value. "Balanced" would have made so much more sense to me. If they have only rejected 2 contributions so far for being less than positive, what is the risk - with proper review of submissions - of presenting views that include both positives and negatives, and the huge category of not-quite-either that lies between those two!